The Spencer book takes some serious study to figure out approaches and scale but I am beginning to really appreciate the vagueness of topos. It really forces one to study the line and moves prior to getting off the ground and really keeps the adventure level at a maximum. Maybe more guide books should follow this style.
Makes me reconsider posting a somewhat crude photo topo of known and partially known routes on Book or Revelation, started by Dan, with some new additions I've added.
I often agree that too much information squelches the adventure. I remember when I first bought the Spencer guide in the early 90s, I was puzzled by some routes on the topos that showed no bolts, showed no cracks, and of course mentioned nothing about gear, AND had no R or X rating. Some of these protect just fine using all kinds of face features and such. Others are true X routes, and you really don't know until you get to the base of the cliff or actually start climbing and observe first hand. OR, if you know something about the FAists and their other routes, it may provide a clue as to what you are up against.
I too look forward to a few pics! The Balls are great fun!