hey john, if your talking about the crack i am calling, dr. no, as far as i am conserned, i put the anchors in and have showed the first topo to it, so i got the california FA on it, if you look on page 50 on the spencer guide book, it does show a short little crack in the middle of the alcove, but thats all, no info, no rating, no name, no nothing, and buzzard book was put up by beckey which is to the far right of dr.no and onyx is a robbens route which it the route closer to dr. no and dr. no ends 70' up or so to slab face climbing the next 300' or so to the top in the middle of gold finger and south pillar which we are going to finish to the top when the season opens once again, so i main piont here again is if one does not have the documentation to back up what's been put up as a new route or climbed a new route i think it's all a bunch of blah blah blah, he said she said....., i know it's only a 5.7 and sure maybe someone as climbed it before, but to date i am the only one to record an ascent on dr. no, who's real got any proof that i did not climb it first???, i guess it's the same with neptune's net 5.7 on runnel vision, where one group claims the fa and another group said they got the fa, so who really got the fa??? slater has a dated pix so he's got the fa and documentation to say his group was there first???, so isn't possesion 2/3th of the law???, so that's my thought on this once again, i am psyched on the next time i am writing here on new routes at fresno dome, it will be just that!!! a repot of the new stuff, with rating and topos of the cool new stuff amy and one have put up, happy climbing arechiga.