Southern Yosemite Climbing Discussions

Southern Yosemite Categories => Shuteye Ridge Area => Topic started by: daniel banquo merrick on July 01, 2014, 08:32:56 am

Title: Big Sleep
Post by: daniel banquo merrick on July 01, 2014, 08:32:56 am
I thought I'd start a general Big Sleep topic since I didn't see one.

Does anybody know anything about the memorial plaque at the camping slab? It's under a tree at the far end of the slab.

(http://danielmerrick.com/SOYO_photos/457.jpg)
Title: Re: Big Sleep
Post by: John on July 01, 2014, 08:53:47 am
I saw that plaque too. Cemented on the slab.

Dan-Did you ever finish your routes?

Seems painfully hot these days yet that doesn't appear to slow down the traffic.
Title: Re: Big Sleep
Post by: squiddo on July 01, 2014, 09:18:20 am
I saw that plaque too. Cemented on the slab.

Dan-Did you ever finish your routes?

Seems painfully hot these days yet that doesn't appear to slow down the traffic.

Nice memory- way better than being 6 ft under in a dirt lot in Sonora.
Title: Re: Big Sleep
Post by: mungeclimber on July 01, 2014, 09:29:38 am
Sonora slander?

Why not Bakersfield?


 :o
Title: Re: Big Sleep
Post by: squiddo on July 01, 2014, 09:33:49 am
Sonora slander?

Why not Bakersfield?


 :o

LOL J/K.....I always see that sad HOT looking dirt cemetery on the hillside in sonora on the way through town.
Title: Re: Big Sleep
Post by: daniel banquo merrick on July 01, 2014, 09:39:41 am
I did go back this year and top out on the first route left of Drench Warfare which is called Good Sleep. Belayed 5 pitches but the last two are very easy. The first three are 5.6, 5.4, 5.2 although I actually don't know what 5.2 is. The first pitch is good although my friend Jay thought it a bit runout. I added two bolts to the second pitch since people thought 200' was a bit far for one bolt and no gear. I would say climb the first three and rap back down.

P1, 5.6R, 190', three cams and 3 bolts, two bolt anchor above last cam
P2, 5.4R, 190', 3 bolts, two bolt anchor
P3, 5.2R, 200', no gear, two bolt anchor at huge pocket
(3rd class exit is possible from here to left and up small gully. Possibly use for descent as no rap anchors above.)
P4, easy, 108', no gear, 180' gear anchor
P5, easy, 180', no gear, gear anchor

The next route left was started by Bob and my son Ford. They did one short 90' pitch on gear with a bolted anchor. Nobody has been back to it that I know of although I'd like to go finish it up this year.

First pitch of Good Sleep:

(http://danielmerrick.com/SOYO_photos/Good%20Sleep%20P1.JPG)
Title: Re: Big Sleep
Post by: mungeclimber on July 01, 2014, 09:46:09 am
Sonora slander?

Why not Bakersfield?


 :o

LOL J/K.....I always see that sad HOT looking dirt cemetery on the hillside in sonora on the way through town.

I recall one in Jamestown on the right side. That's ok to slander Jamestown. But don't tell Lance I said that. :)
Title: Re: Big Sleep
Post by: susan on July 01, 2014, 05:35:31 pm
Looks good Dan!

Who is that in the picture? You & ?
Title: Re: Big Sleep
Post by: daniel banquo merrick on July 01, 2014, 06:00:46 pm
I think I took the picture. I believe it is Ford Merrick and Erin Takagishi.
Title: Re: Big Sleep
Post by: YETI on July 01, 2014, 07:58:24 pm
Cool Dan!

I have never seen that plaque, have to check it out next time.

Saw your route over the last year or so, fun looking romp indeed.

have to check it out.
Title: Re: Big Sleep
Post by: John on July 02, 2014, 07:45:33 am
Dan-
I saw gear fixed on what must be your leftmost line, like 50' up. Was that you?
Title: Re: Big Sleep
Post by: daniel banquo merrick on July 02, 2014, 09:43:10 am
Bob and Ford did a 90' pitch on gear leaving a two bolt anchor. I don't know of anybody else who has climbed the next line to the left. Bob called it The Sandman 5.7. We plan to go back someday and see where it goes. If it is the same line, it seems odd that somebody would bail leaving gear when there is a rappel station at 90'. Somebody on a single 50m rope?
Title: Re: Big Sleep
Post by: John on July 02, 2014, 09:47:06 am
the gear was really low and in fact we considered bouldering up to grab it yet figured it was yours so we left it there.
Title: Re: Big Sleep
Post by: Climberdude on September 26, 2015, 08:08:39 pm
Banquero,

Today I did your climb "Good Sleep".  It was an excellent climb.  However, unless I did some other route on the upper section, I think you mixed up the lengths of Pitches 4 and 5 as described earlier in this thread.  I found Pitch 4 to be at least 190 feet and Pitch 5 to be about 120 feet (this depends upon where you stop climbing roped up).  You listed the rating of Pitch 4 as "easy", but I would give it about 5.4, particularly the moves up the steeper section getting to the overlap where you can get gear in.  This pitch is very runout and does not have protection at the crux of the pitch.  I would agree that Pitch 5 deserves the rating  of "easy" as I thought it was about 5.1-5.2.  I was able to get in some gear on Pitch 3 in a crack on the left.  I used Black Diamond old style cams 0.5 through 3.5 and a set of Black Diamond X4 cams.

Mark Fletcher
Title: Re: Big Sleep
Post by: Climberdude on September 26, 2015, 08:19:04 pm
I agree with Banquero's recommendation to do the first three pitches of "Good Sleep" and then rappel down.  I went to the top on the Pitches 4 and 5 which do not allow rappelling due to gear anchors.  The bushwack down the left side of the formation is pretty bad.  I would grade Pitch 4 as 5.4 R+ and Pitch 5 as 5.1-5.2.
Title: Re: Big Sleep
Post by: John on September 28, 2015, 08:01:15 am
Mark
There is a path down the left side that is pretty cruiser. You need to follow the true left edge of the slab and not the dirty slabs. There is kind of a strip of rocky hillside that splits the clean and dirty slab sections that needs to be located and then followed on its skiers left. There are some sketchy-looking downclimb sections but they are actually reasonable once you have done them before. The correct path lands you right around where Dan's climbs are with zero whacking of bush.

I walk off every time at Big Sleep since the raps suck so bad due to the rope drag on the pulls. Due to the angle and texture, every inch of your ropes is dragging against the slab creating unbearable drag. We rapped Afternoon Nap once and wouldn't do that ever again unless we really had to. One day Josh and Sean did something like four or five routes to the top on Big Sleep which wouldn't happen if they had rapped.
Title: Re: Big Sleep
Post by: daniel banquo merrick on September 28, 2015, 08:54:54 am
Thanks for posting your thoughts about the route. I'm pleased that you liked it. Post a photo or two if you took any.

I suppose parts of it are a bit runout - more so before I added more bolts on pitch two. It has been awhile since I climbed it and I really don't recall much detail except the first pitch is fun and the huge belay pocket at the top of pitch 3.

The lower grades are always a mystery to me so anything less than 5.6 tends to be "easy" to me which may be unfair to those who rely on my ratings. Since I suck at climbing, Bob tends to rate routes as "greater than Dan" and "Less than Dan." I am too embarrassed to tell you what a greater than Dan rating actually is.
Title: Re: Big Sleep
Post by: mungeclimber on September 28, 2015, 10:04:04 am
lower grades are hard since inexperienced climbers have no frame of reference and experienced climbers 'range' of grades with which they are experienced seems to settle at 5.6 and up.


Brimstone Stairway at Joshua Tree is a 5.2. It's a ladder, quite literally.
So a real ladder might be 5.0.

A ladder with a slightly smaller rungs might be 5.3 and 5.4 and so on.

With slabby routes I find the difference between 5.0 and 5.4 to be harder to grade. 5.4 seems like real fifth class, e.g. if the exposure made me think twice.

Below that 5.0 to 5.3 is just a degree of slab and features of slab walking/crawling and can almost always be done no-handed on slabs.


I may have a guide to rating low grade climbs there, eh?
Title: Re: Big Sleep
Post by: Climberdude on September 28, 2015, 05:58:26 pm
Dan,

Yes, I know what you mean that it is hard to judge the ratings on easier climbs.  I really liked the climb, particularly since I only had a written description of the climb and not a photograph of where the start was.  I guessed right about where the start was.  I really liked Pitch 4 although it was very runout.  I do not think you should change the climb, but rather it might be good to let people know that Pitch 4 is a heads-up pitch.

Mark
Title: Re: Big Sleep
Post by: susan on September 29, 2015, 03:28:55 pm
I've seen some people really downplay concern for falling on slab. As if you couldn't glide on forever because they see angles easing enough to slow and arrest a fall before too long. Myself, I tend to wonder if the force of a fall gaining momentum combined with the potential loss of control shouldn't push some of these R ratings to X.
Title: Re: Big Sleep
Post by: daniel banquo merrick on September 29, 2015, 03:47:17 pm
I "fell" on a slab once - the cookie sheet. Bob was belaying me on one of his routes while talking to a pretty gal. The rock was covered in a hatch of some kind of little bugs and my feet greased off as I neared a bolt. On my feet, I slid past the last bolt and thought Bob would catch me soon. I slid past another bolt and began to worry. Just as I reached the first bolt above the belay, the rope came tight and I stopped. I'm pretty sure Bob had been giving me a somewhat slack belay.

I stayed on my feet and simply glissaded backwards. I think I was lucky that I didn't hit an edge. It would be like when your skateboard stops and you don't, only going backwards, down a steep slope. I think that a featured slab could be a real meat grinder.
Title: Re: Big Sleep
Post by: daniel banquo merrick on September 29, 2015, 04:11:09 pm
While I'm thinking about it.

I don't have much in the way of plans for the weekend. If anybody wants to see where the route left of Good Sleep goes, let me know.

Or, if anybody wants to camp out and drink beer, that would do also.

Also an unfinished route on QT.

Otherwise, I plan to take my camera and disappear into the back country for a couple days. If anybody wants to do that.
Title: Re: Big Sleep
Post by: susan on September 29, 2015, 04:24:24 pm
Ooh close call there at the Cookie Sheet, Dan.

This weekend we couldn't, unfortunately, but I hope you get a taker. Would be fun.



Title: Re: Big Sleep
Post by: mungeclimber on September 29, 2015, 05:14:30 pm
would, but preoccupied with 108 for the moment.
Title: Re: Big Sleep
Post by: NateD on September 29, 2015, 05:15:41 pm
There were some good stories years ago on ST about basically turning and running down slabs on a fall to avoid the rolling and the road rash. I've slipped on a wet seep and took a 25-30' swinging fall, and ended up kinda running down backwards - just an automatic reaction to keep my feet under me I suppose.

How did your shoes fare in all the sliding, Dan?