I agree with PG13 for Wing Feather. I've been a little bit run out on it every time and where it would suck to fall. I never got that many slung chickenheads, and what I did were not confidence inspiring. Plus, they're chickenheads - don't want to strike any with an ankle.
Mostly recall seeing PG13s all over the green Tuolomne guide and maybe Gunks along with G ratings at the Gunks, but that rating system is other places also. Been a while since I've cracked open many other guidebooks tho.
G - Great stances for pro all the way
PG13 - More challenging gear placements but not likely to get hurt if fall
R - Likely to get banged up or hurt if fall
X - YGD or wish you were
The last thing I ever want to hear is that someone climbed one of my routes and got seriously injured or died as a result of me not putting in an extra bolt or two.
Of course that is totally understandable and worth repeating DaveyTree. Seems originally the main focus of climbing was exploration and adventure, though, and it would be a sad day if climbs rich in this flavor are automatically written off as unsafe bc, say, a party would have to commit to top out or else leave gear to rap to safety if they had to and the route wasn't so equipped....
Since no one can accommodate for all the different perspectives, abilities, body types, mindsets, or sorts of climbs that different people prefer, let alone possible ways someone could get hurt, and there is a lot of gray area and varying perspectives, I really like the concept of simply asking oneself, would I want to repeat the route in question as it is?